Showing posts with label music. Show all posts
Showing posts with label music. Show all posts

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

Interview with Mike Adams 1


Mike Adams wrote a book about Lee De Forest and i interviewed him about it. This is first part of the interview.



1) When and where were you born?


I was born in the small town of Newark,Ohio, now a suburb of Columbus. The year was 1943.

2) What is your first memory of radio?

So my first memory of radio was during the last 10 years of its life as a so-called "full service" media. Rather than the formats of music, news or talk as it is today, beginning in the 1930s through the late 1950s, most radio stations followed this schedule:

(1) Morning show with entertainment and news and guests (like the Today show on TV) 
(2) Soap operas, shows for women (it was assumed that the man of the house was working and the wife who stayed at home as a home maker would want to be entertained and informed by issues of family, fashion, food, child-rearing, etc.)
(3) Kid shows in the mid-afternoon to entertain the kids, shows like the Lone Ranger and Superman.
(4) News at 5 or 6 for dad when he came home from work
(5) family shows, like TV today, game and quiz shows, mysteries, drama, comedy, cowboy, music, only without the pictures.

By 1960 all of these shows had moved from radio to television and radio became a delivery vehicle for popular music.

So I was a typical radio listener and I listened daily, I had my favorite shows. This experience led me to want to understand how the radio worked from a technical point of view so I did tear apart many old sets to see the parts, and I went to the library often and checked out books on how radio worked. I was also reading books on the radio industry, what went on at a radio station, careers in radio, thinking about my future beyond that of a kid.

3) How many years did you work in radio industry and what are the best memories of that time?

So when I graduated from High School in 1960 I attended Ohio University as a Radio-TV-Film major and immediately I began working for the college station, WOUB-AM. (There was a small FM version but in 1960 AM was the dominant technology and most AM stations used their FM transmitters to carry the programming of the AM channel. In 1960 radio we had one foot in the past and because of rock and roll music's popularity we saw a different future for radio.) At WOUB I was a news reporter and a disc jockey, the latter was my preference and would be my future. I was so interested in radio that I neglected to attend classes so I flunked out. By then I was working at the local Athens, Ohio commercial radio station, WATH.



After a few years in Athens, I applied for and received a job at the big Columbus, Ohio top-40 station, "The New WCOL." This was an important era (the 1960s) for AM top-40 radio, and I worked there for 10 years (1963-1973) as a DJ, program director, production director. It was the most exciting time to be in radio, the DJs were important, we were connected to the listeners, the music industry, and in a way that has not happened since. Then the local top-40 station had over 50% of the audience, unheard of today, and then there was no competition from Internet, satellite, even FM was carrying the same audio as their AM main stations. All of this popularity of radio was helped by the Beatles and other British groups, and in America it was Motown. It was the music.



But working a radio station - even a popular one, even when you believed you were a big "star," was getting to be routine, boring, not so real. I was in my mid 20s and I did not think I was good enough to be a major radio star and I did not really care for an industry based on selling things to people that they mostly didn't need. Plus by the late 1960s there was a whole world of music out there that didn't fit the 3 minute top-40 format.

Meanwhile I had unfinished business - College. When I moved to Columbus for WCOL, I lived right on North High St, the Ohio State University neighborhood. I applied and began to attend part time and by 1973 I had received a BA in Speech and an MA in film. In 1974 I left radio behind and moved to LA, living first in Hollywood then Venice, and besides working for a documentary film company I began to teach part time at a college. I liked it, I eventually (1988) received a tenure track job at San Jose State University. It was here where I am now the Associated Dean of the College of Humanities and the Arts that I came full circle. I was hired to teach radio, TV and Film, but I was also hired to be the faculty advisor to KSJS-FM, and I am still advisor today, 25 years later. In the back of my mind I always remembered how satisfying the college radio experience was, so I still have it. With commercial radio experience behind me, I returned to college radio, but in charge. 


To be continued

Friday, 6 November 2009

Best DJs of 2009!!

Armin Van Buren, world's n.1 DJ (pic from Flickr)


I talked about it one year ago, two years ago and I can't miss it this year!
DJ magazine wrote the TOP 100 DJ of 2009, the first two positions haven't changed:

1 Armin Van Buuren - (Netherlands) Third year in a row as world number one!

2 Tiësto - (Netherlands)

3 David Guetta - (France)

4 Above & Beyond (England)

5 Paul Van Dyk - (Germany)

6 Deadmau5 - (Canada)

7 Ferry Corsten - (Netherlands)

8 Markus Schulz - (Germany)

9 Gareth Emery - (England)

10 Sander van Doorn - (Netherlands)

11 ATB - (Germany)

12 Infected Mushroom - (Israel)

13 Sasha - (Wales)

14 Axwell - (Sweden)

15 Andy Moor - (England)

16 Bobina - (Russia)

17 John Digweed - (England)

18 Carl Cox - (England)

19 Cosmic Gate - (Germany)

20 Steve Angello - (Greece-Sweden)


---
To know the whole TOP 100, click here

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Best DJs of 2008!!


record needle on technics 1210 (pic from Flickr)

I talked about it one year ago and I can't miss it this year!
DJ magazine wrote the TOP 100 DJ of 2008, the first two positions haven't changed:

1 Armin Van Buuren - (Netherlands)

2 Tiësto - (Netherlands)

3 Paul Van Dyk - (Germany)

4 Above & Beyond - (England)

5 David Guetta - (France)

6 Ferry Corsten - (Netherlands)

7 Sasha - (Wales)

8 Markus Schulz - (Germany)

9 John Digweed - (England)

10 Infected Mushroom - (Israel)

11 Deadmau5 - (Canada)

12 Carl Cox - (England)

13 Sander van Doorn - (Netherlands)

14 Paul Oakenfold - (England)

15 Richie Hawtin - (England)

16 Hernan Cattaneo - (Argentina)

17 James Zabiela - (England)

18 Andy Moor - (England)

19 Eddie Halliwell - (England)

20 Axwell - (Sweden)
--
To know the whole TOP 100, click here

Monday, 10 December 2007

Stockhausen 1928-2007



Karlheinz Stockhausen, genius of modern music, died few days ago; The Independent writes:

Karlheinz Stockhausen: Composer acclaimed as a genius for his work in electronic music

10 December 2007

Karlheinz Stockhausen, composer and conductor: born Mödrath, Germany 22 August 1928; Artistic Director, Westdeutscher Rundfunk Electronic Music Studio 1963-77, Artistic Consultant 1977-90; Professor of Composition, Cologne State Conservatory 1971-77; married 1951 Doris Andreae (one son, three daughters; marriage dissolved), 1967 Mary Bauermeister (one son, one daughter; marriage dissolved); died Kürten, Germany 5 December 2007.

Karlheinz Stockhausen was one of only a tiny number of composers born and working in the 20th century who transformed the field of music. Like most prominent composers of his time, what brought him to the fore was not so much his musical talent as his overall vision, intellectual brilliance and work-discipline.

As with many artists, his abilities were apparent in his infancy, but the path he would eventually take did not seem the obvious one. Simon, his father, was a primary school teacher. His mother, Gertrud, came from a prosperous farming family. When Karlheinz was born in 1928, in Mödrath – a small mining village near Cologne – Germany was a depressed country in the thick of inter-war turmoil. Simon Stockhausen was shunted from job to job and, each time, the family moved with him. When Karlheinz was scarcely four, his mother suffered a breakdown and was admitted to the local mental hospital.

Karlheinz's first piano studies were with the organist of Altenberg cathedral. He took to the instrument with such speed that within a year he played duets at local functions. After only one hearing, he could play back popular tunes or operatic themes.

The boy was spontaneously religious. Prayers were part of the daily routine at home. When Simon was "encouraged" to join the Nazi party, however, he had to discourage prayer at school, a discrepancy which made a lasting impact on his son.

Simon left for the front as an officer and Karlheinz Stockhausen was himself drafted in autumn 1944. As a stretcher-bearer he tended wounded soldiers from many different countries. "Death became something completely relative for me," he later recalled. He never saw his father again, and his mother – along with other mental patients – had been killed as an act of government policy.

As a post-war orphan he moved to Cologne and lived hand-to-mouth, working as a car park attendant and night-watchman. His first thought for a vocation was literature; he started to write poems and stories, inspired by Hermann Hesse's The Glass Bead Game. Music seemed, improbably, a way to earn money. Stockhausen played the piano in cafés, restaurants and bars and, just after he decided to concentrate on music, he spent a year improvising accompaniments for Adrion the conjuror.

Music in post-war Europe was as much in ferment as society and politics. A quarter-century earlier, Arnold Schoenberg had sown the seeds, revolutionising music by devising (some would say discovering) "composition using 12 tones". He would rework a melodic idea until it used all 12 notes of the octave, then extrapolate the intervals from the sequence. This pattern served as the basis for the cohesion and comprehensibility of the music. While Schoenberg saw the method as a continuation of tradition, the rising generation wanted to break with the past. The young Europeans tried to do so by applying the 12-tone principle with conceptual rigour to other dimensions of the music, such as rhythm and tone-colour.

Stockhausen became a pioneer of this "total serialism". In Kreuzspiel (1951), not only were the pitches organised in a series, but the durations too. Kontra-Punkte (1952-53) uses six different groups of timbre, which drop out one by one, until only the piano is left. Six degrees of volume are gradually reduced to a continuously soft level, and a diversity of note lengths gradually slims down to similar durations.

Total serialism, as practised by Stockhausen and peers such as Pierre Boulez, was soon attacked as "Augenmusik" – music for the eyes, not for the ears. If you wrote this way, it was argued, you took the notes from your intellectual schemes, not from what you heard in your head – and listeners could not follow them.

Certainly, Stockhausen and his followers tended to couch descriptions of their work in terms of "research", and were constantly inventing scientific-sounding terminology such as "group" and "moment" form. When Stockhausen worked in Paris in one of the early electronic music studios, he proposed a study made up of tiny permutations of a single sound. "Don't do that," the studio director, Pierre Schaeffer, advised. "You'll only hear background noise." Stockhausen persevered, and eventually played the result to Schaeffer. "All you heard was 'shuuutt'," Schaeffer remembered. "He was terribly pleased with it."

Characteristically, Stockhausen carried on, taking no account of criticism. He saw total serialism through to its conclusion, in works such as Gruppen, for three orchestras (1955-57) and his piano pieces. Kontakte (1959-60), for piano, percussion, and tape, tackled the compositional problem of relating acoustic and electronic sounds, in a way which remains unsurpassed. Zyklus (1959), his percussion solo, took Stockhausen's electro-acoustic researches and applied them to an instrumental work.

At the end of the Fifties, Stockhausen was undoubtedly the national composer of Germany. Although he was barely 30, he employed a series of compositional assistants, and held a pivotal place in the major music summer schools in Darmstadt and later Cologne.

In 1951 he had married Doris Andreae, daughter of a wealthy Hamburg shipbuilder, and for the next decade she was "the ideal wife", looking after their domestic affairs, leaving him free to work, and keeping open house for visiting composer friends. Early in the Sixties, however, his artistic connections with the painter Mary Bauermeister spilled over into an affair.

Since Stockhausen's music is on the surface highly intellectual, it is easy to overlook his emotional life and its relation to his work. It is, though, there for all to see. He dramatised his conflict of loyalties, for instance, in his lengthy Momente (1961-64), for soprano, four choir groups, and 13 instrumentalists. The material is grouped into K (Klang, timbre), M (melody) and D (duration) moments, which also happen to stand for Karlheinz, Mary and Doris.

Beginning in the mid-Sixties, Stockhausen turned towards a more intuitive type of music-making, providing form but not content for the players. Scores such as Prozession (1967) and Kurzwellen (1968) consist of signs directing the musicians to transform sounds spontaneously in specific ways. He formed his own performance group, and coached its members to play his new pieces in what he felt was the appropriate way – which from time to time led to clashes.

In May 1968 – that time of global crisis – Mary Bauermeister left him. Responding creatively as usual, he went into seclusion and wrote a series of text scores, elusive in their instructions. "Play a vibration in the rhythm of the universe" is the invitation of one text. "What shall I do with that?" asked Group Stockhausen's pianist, Aloys Kontarsky.

Mantra (1970), for two pianos, ring modulators and incidental percussion, marked a return to conventional notation, and a new approachability. Stockhausen later remembered with pride that while touring the work he and the pianists would often hum the motif which forms the basis for the work.

It was around this time that his spiritual leanings, which he had long fulfilled through Catholicism, intensified, latching on to an amalgam of apocalyptic thought and Eastern mysticism. Sirius (1974), for instance, is premissed on Jakob Lorber's pronouncement that the human race was founded thousands of years ago by benign space-travellers from the Dog Star. The piece begins and ends with the depiction of space-ship engines landing and taking off.

The early Seventies marked the zenith of Stockhausen's popularity (his standing among fellow-composers was at its greatest 10 years earlier). By the Eighties, the music establishment took him less and less seriously, and his influence dwindled.

This was partly due to his personality. Charming, albeit opinionated, as a young man, many felt that after his crisis in the Sixties he had become a megalomaniac. Some people were offended by his polygamous relations with his female interpreters (to whom he referred on occasion as his "squaws") and by the apparent nepotism of including family members in his performances. He fell out with his publisher and record company over what they felt were unreasonable demands.

Partly, too, his falling sign was the flip-side of his early success. For Stockhausen, as for many who made their name at an early age (consider Orson Welles), it was hard to satisfy public expectations when he had been acclaimed as a genius while still in his twenties. From 1977 onwards, he subsumed his compositional work in a single project – Licht (Light), a cycle of seven operas, named after the days of the week. Stockhausen declared that he would devote the rest of his working life to its completion, straddling, he planned, the millennium. Commissions which came his way for short works could be the occasion to compose an individual scene. He could build up most of each opera in this piecemeal way, until a major opera house agreed to mount the whole.

It was an audacious ambition, taking his character and his way of working to their natural conclusion. Licht was eventually finished more than a quarter of a century later, in 2003, and Stockhausen embarked upon Klang (Sound), a still unfinished cycle based on the 24 hours of the day.

Thursday, 8 November 2007

Radiohead's experiment



The Times writes: 62% didn't pay a cent for Radiohead album but maybe the news should be "38% could download it legally for free but they did decide to pay".
Matt from NYC writes: "1.2 million people paid an average of $6.00, thats $7.2 million for this album; ANY artist would kill for that kind of money off an album".
7.2 million of US dollars (in 1 month!) and no percentage to any label. Not bad, isn't it?
---
3 in 5 'didn't pay a cent' for Radiohead album
November 6, 2007, Jonathan Richards
62 per cent of fans didn't pay for In Rainbows, undermining hopes that 'honesty boxes' could be the future for online music

Radiohead's grand experiment in 'honesty box' music sales may have gone a little flat after a report found that three in five people downloading the band's latest album did not pay a cent for it.

Of the 1.2 million people who have downloaded In Rainbows since it was released last month, 62 per cent did not pay anything, and 12 per cent accounted for more than 52 per cent of the revenue from sales.

The average price paid was $6 (£2.90) globally, but this figure was propped up by the 12 per cent who were willing to pay between $8 to $12 (£3.90 to £5.80) - the approximate cost of downloading an album from a retail service like iTunes, the report, by comScore, concluded.

American music-lovers were the most generous, paying on average $8.05 (£3.89). Outside the US, the average amount parted with was $4.64 (£2.24).

ComScore tracks - to the last detail - the online behaviour of more than two million people worldwide, so its figures are not based on a survey. Shortly after the album's release nearly a month ago, online polls suggested that the average purchase was £4.

At the time, the band's decision was viewed by some as a future direction for the industry, which has struggled to combat declining sales in the face of widespread illegal downloading.

Other prominent musicians, including Trent Reznor from the band Nine Inch Nails, praised Radiohead for experimenting with a model, and Guy Hands, head of the private equity firm Terra Firma which recently bought EMI called the move "a wake-up call which we should all welcome and respond to."

But labels and other industry representatives expressed disappointment in the wake of yesterday's report, saying that while a band with an established fan base was able to take such risks, it was not an option for new bands, who still benefit from the support of labels.

Tim Dellow, co-founder of Transgressive, a smaller, London-based label, said: "It's depressing. Radiohead might have made a killing off this, but it was largely because of their fanbase built up over time with the help of a major label and its distribution and marketing channels."

"Most new acts don't have fans who would shell out £40 for the box set, and any profits (from this type of venture) would be impractical for making a living out of music."

Mike Driver, editor of DrownedinSound, a music news site, said that younger bands would find the honesty box method "unlikely to raise their profile any more than making a couple of tracks available on MySpace."

Fred Wilson, managing partner of Union Square Ventures, which invests in small, internet start-ups, said: "This shows pretty conclusively that the majority of music consumers feel that digital recorded music should be free and is not worth paying for."

A source at one of the major labels said that allowing fans to pay what they wanted for music would never work, because people would always steal. "Radiohead tried to spin this is offering a service for fans, but it was nothing more than a marketing ploy to make themselves relevant again and prepare for their next release. The reality is music has real value, and there has to be a way of capitalising on that."

A spokesman for Radiohead was not available for comment.

Thursday, 1 November 2007

Lala: music social network



From Wired the story of Lala: from trading CDs to a music social network

Free Music Now! Lala.com's Plan to Give Songs Away Could Upend the Industry
By Cliff Kuang               10.oct.07

Bill Nguyen sold his first company, Onebox, in 2000 for $800 million. Then he built a mobile email provider, Seven, into a multimillion-dollar enterprise, leaving in 2004 as majority owner. Next he did what any unemployed rich guy might do: took vacations in St. Tropez and Vail, went surfing in Costa Rica, acquired a garageful of very fast cars.

One day in the winter of 2004, Nguyen was having dinner in San Francisco with friends Chris Collingwood and Brian Young of the band Fountains of Wayne. They had known each other since the group played a corporate event at Seven a few years earlier. The conversation turned to child-rearing. Come on, they implored, don't let your kid grow up with a self-indulgent dad on permanent vacation. Nguyen replied that he had nothing left to prove in the software industry. Why don't you fix the music industry, then? they suggested half seriously.

Nguyen could think of a bunch of reasons why he shouldn't go near the music industry. CD sales had dropped almost 20 percent since 2000. Peer-to-peer transactions — dominated by pirated media — accounted for almost 60 percent of North American data traffic. Tower Records had just filed for bankruptcy. The industry was in free fall. Yet the more Nguyen thought about it, the more intrigued he became.

Nguyen's complaint with the way music is sold online — whether it's CD purchases or downloads — is that there's no easy, legal way to listen to a song before you buy it. A 30-second snippet on Amazon.com or iTunes is rarely enough to form a good impression and certainly not enough to get a tune stuck in your head. Nguyen's solution: Give the music away. Later this year, his new company, Lala, will begin streaming any track or album the user selects, for free, betting that the chance to explore the sonic landscape will get listeners excited. As they take in artists and genres they might otherwise never hear, music fans are going to want to own the songs, Nguyen says — and Lala will be right there to make that possible, via whatever channel and format the customer prefers: downloading tracks, trading discs, or even (gasp) buying the CDs. It's a model he believes will revive the music industry.

Nguyen started small. Lala.com launched in June 2006 as a membership service that facilitated CD swaps. The site lets music fans list the CDs they own and the CDs they want, and then it arranges trades. Each transaction costs $1.75, which pays for a nifty Netflix-like envelope, 75 cents in shipping, a roughly 20-cent honorarium deposited into a trust fund for artists, and, of course, a fee for the middleman. (Nguyen says he kicks something back to the performers because he values the artistic community. Or maybe he just doesn't want to get sued by musicians who feel they're being screwed.) The arrangement exploits a loophole in copyright law: While distributing duplicates is verboten, it's perfectly legal to trade your own property. (And there's nothing to prevent Lala users from ripping a copy of a disc before they send the original off to someone else.) The site hummed along nicely enough, and in February 2007, Lala quietly added CD sales to its offerings.

But things move quickly when you've got a winning track record as an entrepreneur and know a bunch of VCs who are itching to put their dollars to work. Nguyen soon had seed money to grow Lala into something far more ambitious than a sneakernet workaround of intellectual property rules.

Lala's first major expenditure struck some as bizarre: In September 2006, the company bought WOXY, a legendary indie radio station in Cincinnati, for an undisclosed sum (reportedly just shy of $1 million). The station had turned to Internet-only programming two years earlier; it was in dire financial straits and had just ceased broadcasting. Lala would have access to WOXY's entire catalog — and the right to stream it online. Fans followed the deal in real time as it unfolded: Nguyen announced his offer on the station's message boards, punctuating his opener with a typo: "Hey folks, we'd like to save ROXY." The responses were predictable: "seems kind of strange, to put it mildly"... "*fingers crossed for a miracle*"... and, after readers' Google searches confirmed the entrepreneur's bona fides, "the fit between b.n. and WOXY is ridiculous — in a good way."

Nguyen's idea was to re-create the business model of the music industry's golden age: Hear a song on the radio, then buy the record. Only now it would all take place on the Web. You'd stream a song from WOXY, then click to purchase the CD if you liked it.

The WOXY deal offers a preview of the system Lala will roll out this fall. Starting in November, according to Nguyen, Lala will offer unlimited on-demand streams of music from two of the four major labels (the company's still negotiating with the other two). That music doesn't come free to Lala — the company expects to pay more than $160 million in licensing fees to the labels over the first two years. Rhapsody has a similar arrangement, but it charges users a subscription fee of about $15 per month. Lala won't charge users a penny. Instead, the company intends to recoup those costs through music sales. It hopes to pull in $120 million in the first two years, which works out to roughly $5 of revenue per user per month, Nguyen says. In addition to brokering trades among members, Lala will deal downloads, sell physical CDs, even hock vinyl — and he says more revenue streams are on the way.

Nguyen designed the site to operate like a social network. The lists of CDs you want and have form the core of your profile, and the people you trade with become your "friends." When the software discovers someone with tastes similar to your own, Nguyen figures you'll regularly click on their profile to check out what they have and want. You can even see the music they're streaming at that moment. Users can make playlists and share them, and if they want a broader audience, they can post the lists to groups within the community. The site also features some clever programming to help you expand your sonic palate, providing user-generated recommendations and playlists automatically populated with new-to-you music. All the while, of course, it'll be easy to buy anything you happen to discover.

Discovery is at the heart of Nguyen's plan — the notion that the way to save the music industry is to help fans range widely and explore new artists and genres. Though no other service or retailer shares his exact business model, plenty are working the discovery angle.

"For every Norah Jones there are a thousand artists like her who just haven't been found," says Pandora founder Tim Westergren, whose site streams custom listening channels based around a listener's favorite band or song, using advertising revenue to pay for it. Qtrax, another ad-supported venture set to launch in December, is essentially a peer-to-peer client but says it has inked deals with the four majors. Users will be able to grab any song off the company's network and listen to it for free. And Last.fm, a music-startup success story, focuses on exposing its listeners to new music. Boasting more than 15million users, it was bought by CBS last May for $280 million.

Even Rhapsody is fundamentally a music discovery site. Sure, it charges a monthly subscription fee, but at its core the venture is similar to Lala: If fans can listen to whatever they want, they'll get amped enough that they won't mind paying for downloads or CDs. As Tim Quirk, Rhapsody's VP of music programming, says, "Rhapsody's real value isn't in an unlimited catalog; it's in the chance to stumble on something new."

Rhapsody's parent company, RealNetworks, reports 2.7 million subscribers for all of its music services. Nguyen projects 500,000 registered users for Lala by the end of 2008, and more than 2 million by the end of 2009. Those numbers may seem ambitious, but Lala has something Rhapsody doesn't: that zero price point. David Card, an analyst at Jupiter Research, says Rhapsody charges too much for too little. "Ten dollars per month doesn't sound like much. But it's more than the average listener wants to spend." As a result, Card says, Rhapsody appeals only to "aficionados with broad and deep music interest." Lala is for everyone else.

Everyone else equates to a lot of potential customers, and Nguyen likes his chances of luring them in. Music fans probably will visit Lala — it's free, after all — but the trick is turning that traffic into dollars. And if Nguyen can't turn free music into money, someone else will.

Monday, 29 October 2007

Vinyl isn't dead



An article from Wired talks about vinyl records.

Vinyl May Be Final Nail in CD's Coffin
by Eliot Van Buskirk

As counterintuitive as it may seem in this age of iPods and digital downloads, vinyl -- the favorite physical format of indie music collectors and audiophiles -- is poised to re-enter the mainstream, or at least become a major tributary.

Talk to almost anyone in the music business' vital indie and DJ scenes and you'll encounter a uniformly optimistic picture of the vinyl market.

"I'm hearing from labels and distributors that vinyl is way up," said Ian Connelly, client relations manager of independent distributor alliance IODA, in an e-mail interview. "And not just the boutique, limited-edition colored vinyl that Jesu/Isis-style fans are hot for right now."

Pressing plants are ramping up production, but where is the demand coming from? Why do so many people still love vinyl, even though its bulky, analog nature is anathema to everything music is supposed to be these days? Records, the vinyl evangelists will tell you, provide more of a connection between fans and artists. And many of today's music fans buy 180-gram vinyl LPs for home listening and MP3s for their portable devices.

"For many of us, and certainly for many of our artists, the vinyl is the true version of the release," said Matador's Patrick Amory. "The size and presence of the artwork, the division into sides, the better sound quality, above all the involvement and work the listener has to put in, all make it the format of choice for people who really care about music."

Because these music fans also listen using portable players and computers, Matador and other labels include coupons in record packaging that can be used to download MP3 versions of the songs. Amory called the coupon program "hugely popular."

Portability is no longer any reason to stick with CDs, and neither is audio quality. Although vinyl purists are ripe for parody, they're right about one thing: Records can sound better than CDs.

Although CDs have a wider dynamic range, mastering houses are often encouraged to compress the audio on CDs to make it as loud as possible: It's the so-called loudness war. Since the audio on vinyl can't be compressed to such extremes, records generally offer a more nuanced sound.

Another reason for vinyl's sonic superiority is that no matter how high a sampling rate is, it can never contain all of the data present in an analog groove, Nyquist's theorem to the contrary.

"The digital world will never get there," said Chris Ashworth, owner of United Record Pressing, the country's largest record pressing plant.

Golden-eared audiophiles have long testified to vinyl's warmer, richer sound. And now demand for vinyl is on the rise. Pressing plants that were already at capacity are staying there, while others are cranking out more records than they did last year in order to keep pace with demand.

Don MacInnis, owner of Record Technology in Camarillo, California, predicts production will be up 25 percent over last year by the end of 2007. And he's not talking about small runs of dance music for DJs, but the whole gamut of music: "new albums, reissues, majors and indies ... jazz, blues, classical, pop and a lot of (classic) rock."

Turntables are hot again as well. Insound, an online music retailer that recently began selling USB turntables alongside vinyl, can't keep them in stock, according to the company's director, Patrick McNamara.

And on Oct. 17, Amazon.com launched a vinyl-only section stocked with a growing collection of titles and several models of record players.

Big labels still aren't buying the vinyl comeback, but it wouldn't be the first time the industry failed to identify a new trend in the music biz.

"Our numbers, at least, don't really point to a resurgence," said Jonathan Lamy, the Recording Industry Association of America's director of communications. Likewise, Nielsen SoundScan, which registered a slight increase in vinyl sales last year, nonetheless showed a 43 percent decrease between 2000 and 2006.

But when it comes to vinyl, these organizations don't really know what they're talking about. The RIAA's numbers are misleading because its member labels are only now beginning to react to the growing demand for vinyl. As for SoundScan, its numbers don't include many of the small indie and dance shops where records are sold. More importantly, neither organization tracks used records sold at stores or on eBay -- arguably the central clearinghouse for vinyl worldwide.

Vinyl's popularity has been underreported before.

"The Consumer Electronics Association said that only 100,000 turntables were sold in 2004. Numark alone sold more than that to pro DJs that year," said Chris Roman, product manager for Numark.

And the vinyl-MP3 tag team might just hasten the long-predicted death of the CD.

San Francisco indie band The Society of Rockets, for example, plans to release its next album strictly on vinyl and as MP3 files.

"Having just gone through the process of mastering our new album for digital and for vinyl, I can say it is completely amazing how different they really sound," said lead singer and guitarist Joshua Babcock in an e-mail interview. "The way the vinyl is so much better and warmer and more interesting to listen to is a wonder."

(Eliot Van Buskirk has covered digital music since 1998, after seeing the world's first MP3 player sitting on a colleague's desk. He plays bass and rides a bicycle.)

Hip Hop: from rebellion to business



An interesting and long article from the american magazine Foreign Policy: Rap music has long been considered a form of resistance against authority. Boosted by the commercialization of the music industry, that message has proven its appeal to youth all around the world. Now, from Shanghai to Nairobi to São Paulo, hip-hop is evolving into a truly global art of communication.

Jeff Chang is editor of Total Chaos: The Art and Aesthetics of Hip-Hop (New York: Basic Civitas Books, 2007) and author of Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop: A History of the Hip-Hop Generation (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2005), which won the 2005 American Book Award.

It’s a Hip-Hop World
By Jeff Chang


Inside the steaming walls of a nightclub in the heart of one of the world’s most dynamic cities, you can hear the sounds of the future. Hundreds of people gyrate rhythmically as a DJ spins hot beats. On stage, a pair of rappers face off, microphones in hand, trading verses of improvised rhyme. They look like typical hip-hop artists, dressed in baggy pants and baseball caps. But listen closely and you notice something unusual: They’re performing in Chinese. One rapper spits out words in a distinctive Beijing accent, scolding the other for not speaking proper Mandarin. His opponent from Hong Kong snaps back to the beat in a trilingual torrent of Cantonese, English, and Mandarin, dissing the Beijing rapper for not representing the people. The crowd goes wild, raucously voicing delight and dismay.

This annual rap battle, called the Iron Mic, isn’t taking place in New York or Los Angeles, but in Shanghai, where its founder, 32-year-old Dana Burton, has unexpectedly found fame and fortune. The Detroit native arrived in China in 1999 to take a job teaching English. During his first week in town, he went to a nightclub that advertised hip-hop music. But the closest thing to hip-hop was a Michael Jackson impersonator. So, Burton embarked on a mission to bring the real thing to the Middle Kingdom. “I thought about what I could offer China,” he says. “It was hip-hop.” Burton began to moonlight as a rapper and developed a following. He not only performed himself but also helped others—foreigners and Chinese—get their own acts off the ground by hosting parties and hip-hop nights such as Iron Mic. Admirers called him “the godfather of Chinese hip-hop.”

Burton soon began to promote tours for famous hip-hop artists visiting from the United States. Today, multinational corporations including Intel, Coca-Cola, and Adidas turn to him when they want help in marketing their consumer goods to China’s booming youth market. Burton then taps into his pool of more than 300 Chinese rappers, DJs, dancers, and graffiti artists.

In a recent campaign for Wyborowa vodka, Burton took his crew on the road, presenting 150 shows in 40 Chinese cities. His artists performed a mini history of hip-hop, from its urban American beginnings to its Chinese apotheosis. It was the perfect brew—an African-American entrepreneur promoting a Polish vodka owned by a French corporation using Chinese performers practicing an Afro-Latin-influenced art form that originated in the inner cities of the United States. Welcome to hip-hop’s new world.

A SERIOUS BUSINESS

To the uninitiated, hip-hop hardly looks or sounds like a brave, new art form. It’s more like a sonic jackhammer, a visual eyesore, and a conceptual nuisance. Critics often call hip-hop materialistic, misogynistic, homophobic, racist, vulgar, and violent. It’s a hot mess, the roar of total chaos.

Some of that is true. But rap music is only a part of the movement, and if you look beyond stereotypes, it’s clear that hip-hop culture has become one of the most far-reaching arts movements of the past three decades. The best artists share a desire to break down boundaries between “high” and “low” art—to make urgent, truth-telling work that reflects the lives, loves, histories, hopes, and fears of their generation. Hip-hop is about rebellion, yes, but it’s also about transformation.

At the core of hip-hop is the notion of something called the “cipher.” Partly for competition and partly for community, the cipher is the circle of participants and onlookers that closes around battling rappers or dancers as they improvise for each other. If you have the guts to step into the cipher and tell your story and, above all, demonstrate your uniqueness, you might be accepted into the community. Here is where reputations are made and risked and stylistic change is fostered. That this communitarian honoring of merit—whether it’s called “style,” “hotness,” or whatever the latest slang for it is—can transcend geography, culture, and even skin color remains hip-hop’s central promise.

Today, the message of hip-hop is even transcending borders. From xi ha in China to “hip-life” in Ghana, hip-hop is a lingua franca that binds young people all around the world, all while giving them the chance to alter it with their own national flavor. It is the foundation for global dance competitions, the meeting ground for local progressive activism, even the subject of study at Harvard and the London School of Economics.

But one thing about hip-hop has remained consistent across cultures: a vital progressive agenda that challenges the status quo. Thousands of organizers from Cape Town to Paris use hip-hop in their communities to address environmental justice, policing and prisons, media justice, and education. In Gothenburg, Sweden, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) incorporate graffiti and dance to engage disaffected immigrant and working-class youths. And indigenous young people in places as disparate as Chile, Indonesia, New Zealand, and Norway use hip-hop to push their generation’s views into the local conversation.

Hip-hop is also a serious business. More than 59 million rap albums were sold in the United States alone last year. But that number represents only a small part of hip-hop’s influence. It sells an estimated $10 billion worth of trend-setting luxury and consumer goods every year—not just in movies, shoes, and clothing but in everything from snack crackers and soda drinks to cars and computers. This “urban aspirational lifestyle” market is expected to continue to grow exponentially. According to a 2006 report by business research company Packaged Facts, the potential purchasing power available to this market in the United States alone is worth $780 billion. American rapper 50 Cent is one of the many savvy businessmen in hip-hop who’s fully grasped this potential. In 2004, he agreed to endorse flavored beverage VitaminWater for a small stake in Glacéau, the company that produced it. In June, Coca-Cola purchased Glacéau for $4.1 billion. When the deal closed, 50 Cent walked away with a rumored $100 million overnight, just for lending his name to a drink.

Of all the rappers out there, mogul and renaissance man Shawn Carter, better known as Jay-Z, is the most successful example of the growing power of hip-hop. When he took over Universal Records’ Def Jam unit in 2004, Jay-Z was put in charge of a billion-dollar business. Some industry insiders believe that today, Def Jam’s overseas business outpaces its domestic business. Jay-Z’s own albums have sold 33 million copies worldwide, and his latest album, released last November, sold 680,000 copies in the United States alone during the first week. He runs popular nightclubs in New York and Atlantic City—with plans to open more next year in Las Vegas, Tokyo, and Macao. The former drug dealer who grew up in poverty in the housing projects of Brooklyn is now worth an estimated $500 million.

RISING UP

With its humble origins, no one could have foreseen the global phenomenon that hip-hop would become. Thirty years ago, New York City bore little resemblance to the glittering metropolis of today, particularly the embattled streets of the Bronx. Race riots, urban renewal, arson, and government neglect wiped out educational and social service programs, eviscerated housing stock, accelerated white flight and job loss, and created an international symbol of urban despair.

Meanwhile, the poor youth of the Bronx found ways to pass the time: rapping in a style adapted from Jamaican reggae with Bronx slang over funky Afro-Latin-influenced grooves, dancing wildly to the percussive breaks, spray-painting their nicknames on walls, buses, and subway trains. These were hip-hop’s original “four elements”—MCing, DJing, b-boying (or “breakdancing”), and graffiti. The street culture was alive to the eccentricities of the politically abandoned neighborhood and the children who still populated it. And the innocent leisure choices of teens, taken together, represented the early makings of an artistic vanguard.

In 1973, two Jamaican-American immigrant teenagers decided to throw a back-to-school party. Cindy Campbell and her brother Clive, better known in the neighborhood as DJ Kool Herc, organized the dance in the recreation room of their government-subsidized apartment building at the now famous address of 1520 Sedgwick Avenue. They had exquisite timing. After years of gang violence, teens in the area were growing weary and looking for a new way to express themselves. “When I went to [the] party, it was like stepping into another universe. The vibe was so strong,” says Tony Tone, a gang member who later became part of the pioneering rap group the Cold Crush Brothers. The Campbells’ Bronx parties became so popular they soon had to move them outdoors to a nearby park. Crowds flocked to them. Instead of getting into trouble on the streets, teens now had a place to expend their pent-up energy. “Hip-hop saved a lot of lives,” recalls Tone.

One such lifesaver was a gang leader named Afrika Bambaataa. Inspired by DJ Kool Herc, he too began hosting hip-hop parties. After a soul-altering visit to Africa, he vowed to use hip-hop to draw poor, angry kids out of gangs, and formed a street organization called Universal Zulu Nation to help spread his message. Soon, New York underground journalists were writing that Bambaataa was “stopping bullets with two turntables.” With this message of empowerment, rap updated African-American poetic traditions, and bore witness to the joyful, soulful, and sometimes angry stories of life in their forgotten America.

PLANET HIP-HOP

Less than a decade after the Campbells’ famous party, hip-hop began to seep outside the United States. In 1982, Afrika Bambaataa and his group Soulsonic Force released a single called “Planet Rock,” which borrowed musical motifs from German electropop, British rock, and African-American disco rap. They blended the elements together, offering hip-hop as a new vision for global harmony. The record stormed the charts worldwide. That same year, Bambaataa led New York’s leading rappers, dancers, artists, and DJs on the first hip-hop tour outside the United States. Bambaataa saw such visits as a key way to expand Universal Zulu Nation and to espouse what he considered the core values of hip-hop: peace, unity, love, and having fun. Everywhere he went, he planted the seeds for the hip-hop movement in Europe, Africa, and Asia.

France, in particular, caught the hip-hop virus. In the 1990s, MC Solaar became the first non-American rap superstar. Solaar was born in Senegal to parents from Chad, and discovered Zulu Nation and the music of Afrika Bambaataa as a young teenager in Paris. His multicultural background appealed to youths throughout the Francophone world, which quickly developed into the largest non-English-speaking rap market. The emerging popularity of cable and satellite television throughout the world in the late 1980s further spread the seeds of hip-hop. In 1988, MTV debuted an experimental pilot program in the United States called Yo! MTV Raps, which aired hip-hop videos once a week in an after-hours slot. Soon, the show grew so popular it was broadcast six days a week. African-American and Latino urban style was instantly accessible to millions of youths, and not just in the United States. Yo! MTV Raps became one of the network’s first globally televised shows—airing in dozens of countries, first on MTV Europe, and then on MTV Asia and MTV Latino a few years later.

One of the groups to get the most airtime was Public Enemy, a collective of mostly college-educated, activist-minded young men with audacious ambitions and the outsized talent to match. Emerging from the largely black inner suburbs of Long Island, New York, the group’s lyrics decried police brutality, racial profiling, gang violence, and political apathy. Their rise convinced many skeptics that hip-hop could be a lasting, potentially lucrative, even socially important art form. Taking a page from Bambaataa’s book, Public Enemy embarked on extended world tours. Its influence was far-reaching. When Public Enemy reached Brazil’s shores in the late 1980s, hip-hop exploded in Latin America. “[Their] song ‘Don’t Believe the Hype’ was so important,” says legendary Brazilian rapper Eliefi of the hit single that championed black power. “We had never seen black folks in a militant stance before.”

Although hip-hop has become mainstream in many parts of the world today, it is still considered a voice for the oppressed, and a provocation to those in power. In fact, the culture wars that hip-hop spawned in the mid-1990s in the United States, with congressional hearings and CD-crushing campaigns, have appeared in Britain, where national debates over hip-hop have stood in for deeper discussions over the thorny issues of race and immigration. In 2003, British Culture Minister Kim Howells turned his bully pulpit on “hateful lyrics that these boasting macho idiot rappers come up with.” Hip-hop has come up against the same resistance in France. Two years ago, angry rap made by the sons of disenfranchised African and Arab immigrants served as the soundtrack to riots in the French banlieues, and again in post-election riots this past spring. Two hundred French members of Parliament signed a petition to curb hip-hop. The petition failed, but the episode was another reminder of how hip-hop can clash with the powers that be.

ALL HIP-HOP IS LOCAL

As hip-hop grows ever more popular, it becomes squeezed in the uneasy space between commercial and economic globalization from above and borderless, cultural grassroots globalization from below. Commercial rap made in the United States—with its ethic of “get rich or die tryin’”—is displacing local rappers and musicians on the radio and television airwaves in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, and South America, while serving as the soundtrack for aggressive, youth-oriented consumer goods marketing.

This rampant commercialism is often at odds with hip-hop’s outsider ethos. In Kenya, for instance, two differing visions—one as a resistance culture oriented toward social justice, the other as a popular culture focused on commodity capitalism—may be increasingly headed toward a reckoning. For some Kenyans, hip-hop has allowed a new generation of postcolonial Africans to speak out. Young Kenyan rappers’ lyrics—in sheng, a creolized language that includes English, Swahili, and Kikuyu words—tackle the themes of joblessness, poverty, and the older generation’s failures. Indeed, young artists are building communities that actively support the development of cultural politics unique to the continent. One Kenyan NGO, Words and Pictures, has been traveling to Ghana, Senegal, South Africa, and Tanzania to promote networking among local hip-hop pioneers. The recent arrival of MTV Base Africa may accelerate these trends. The network was launched in South Africa at the beginning of 2005 with a playlist that was roughly one third African. Since then, the proportion of artists from the continent has risen, and the network says it hopes to reach 50 percent African programming in the next year. But on the radio, hip-hop from overseas is increasingly becoming the norm. Stations such as Britain’s Capital FM and locally owned KISS FM sell advertising to multinational corporations like Motorola and Nokia. They prefer to program American artists such as 50 Cent because such rap helps corporations sell consumer goods. But local rappers, whose music critiques government and poverty, dub American rap, ironically, “white-boy oppressor music,” even though the artists are predominantly African American.

Nairobi native Michael Wanguhu, who created the documentary film Hip-Hop Colony, says this kind of cultural homogenization and commercial sponsorship are becoming major worries. “It’s creating opportunities where there were none before,” he says, “but there’s no room for music that is enlightened and empowers people.” Still, he is bullish on hip-hop’s expansion.

“Hip-hop in Africa is like the new Pan-Africanism,” he says. “It’s diffusing all the borders we have and creating new organizations and expanding that whole market.”

THE GLOBAL CIPHER

Every October in Braunschweig, Germany, 8,500 hip-hop fans from around the world gather to witness the biggest global hip-hop dance competition, the Battle of the Year. First organized by German b-boy Thomas Hergenröther 16 years ago as a tiny showcase for a handful of dance crews from Germany and Hungary, the event has expanded into nothing less than the World Cup of hip-hop dance. Elimination competitions are held in 20 countries, including Albania, China, Estonia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Serbia, and South Africa. At the finals, 20 teams featuring about 200 dancers represent their respective countries on the main stage of Braunschweig’s Volkswagen Halle.

Film director Benson Lee captured the 2005 competition for his documentary, Planet B-Boy. In telling the story of one year in the contest, Lee reveals the diversity of hip-hop’s global participants—working-class immigrants rejecting the hopelessness of the Parisian suburbs, youths trying to spring themselves from the homogeneity of Tokyo’s urban retailscapes, even conscripts from the South Korean army. “These kids aren’t thugs. They are artists,” says Lee. “The main essence of hip-hop is community.”

Hip-hop events such as the Battle of the Year create spaces for a globalization from the bottom, bringing people together across the barriers of geography, language, and race. Lee’s movie reveals tensions between the American and French teams, which both perform with aggressive, bold attitudes. Everyone fears the upstart South Koreans, a team of superbly synchronized underdogs sporting patriotic white, red, and aqua-colored hooded track suits. “What Germany or France did in 15 years,” Hergenröther says with awe, “they managed in five.”

In one scene, the German team—whose crew prominently features African and Arab immigrants—choreographs a humorous Aladdin’s magic carpet sequence, taking a pointed jab at the country’s continuing immigration wars. “So many different people came together under the name of hip-hop, that hip-hop changed music, arts completely,” says a German b-boy who goes by the name “Storm.”

But the essence of hip-hop is the cipher, born in the Bronx, where competition and community feed each other. It is here that hip-hop always returns. In the final round of Battle of the Year, the crews line up and verbally attack each other, either one-on-one or “commando style,” all at once. It is always a night of riotous explosion of bodies, as dancers burst to the breakbeats. The climax of the battle, the most thrilling part, is itself the deepest kind of communication. “It happens in an exchange,” says Storm. “He’s giving me something that I can relate to and I have to answer with something that he can relate to so that we can continue this battle.” It’s the kind of exchange that happens daily, among millions, in almost every corner of the world.

Saturday, 27 October 2007

The price of music


How much is music worth in an age when just about any song can be grabbed for free?

Steven Levy tries to answer from the pages of Newsweek.


How Much Is Music Worth?

Is 99 cents a song the magic number? No way. When a music service tested cutting prices in half, sales went up sixfold.
Oct 29, 2007

On Oct. 10, the beloved British rock band Radiohead made some history. The group had produced a new CD—but didn't release it. At least not in CD form. Those who wanted to hear the feverishly anticipated studio album "In Rainbows" could grab the work only by downloading it from the band's Web site.

Here's the twist: there was no set price. Going to Radiohead's site, one was confronted with a blank field when it came to payment: you could enter a figure from zero up to hundreds of dollars (everyone had to pay about 90 cents) and receive in return a code that would let you download the songs in unprotected form, listenable on iPods, Zunes or PCs. It was almost like the band had taken to heart the title of its breakthrough work—"OK Computer."

How much is music worth in an age when just about any song can be grabbed for free? The results from Radiohead fans don't really answer the question (and the band has yet to release official figures). But by all accounts, the experiment makes one thing clear that should have been already as obvious as a rimshot: real people don't agree with the record labels.

Online pricing until recently was fairly standard, thanks to the dominant seller, Apple. When Steve Jobs negotiated with the record labels prior to the iTunes Music Store's 2003 ribbon-cutting, he demanded a flat price—99 cents a song and (by and large) $10 for a whole CD. (In the endangered brick-and-mortar record stores, the tariff is about $14 to $17 for a disc, and no cherry-picking.) The labels went along. But now they are unhappy that Jobs makes more money selling iPods than they do selling songs, and they want the freedom to charge more.

Yet is 99 cents the magic number? No way. A couple of years ago, the music service Rhapsody funded a test: for a few weeks it subsidized a price cut of songs to 49 cents, and cut album prices from 10 bucks to five. Sales went up sixfold. Unlike with shipping physical products, selling the next downloaded song costs almost zero—from the standpoint of the seller, there isn't much more involved in shipping 60,000 copies of a song than there is in shipping 10,000. It doesn't take a math major to figure out that when costs of the next copy are near zero, cutting prices and selling many more units is going to make you more money.

It seems weird for the labels to have these spats when their real problem isn't Apple, but the billions of songs traded online free. The labels' method of dealing with those services is to sue consumers who use them. In one of those cases, a court has set a price for music: a $222,000 penalty for a Minnesota mom who shared 24 songs, which comes to somewhat over $9,000 a tune. Nonetheless, no one thinks that music file-sharing is going away.

That leads us to Radiohead. A surprising 1.2 million visitors reportedly downloaded "In Rainbows" in the first few days. The consensus of those doing surveys of customers is that many are paying $5 to $15. A few have dropped a bundle. But perhaps a third have chosen to pay nothing. (The band's co-manager would say only, "More have paid for it than not.") Think about it. The musicians are implicitly saying, "We work hard to craft these tunes. We're in this together, mate. Here's your chance to do the right thing." Yet hundreds of thousands have looked their heroes in the eye, snatched the goods and left the collection plate empty. And according to online music tracker Big Champagne, more than 500,000 copies of the Radiohead songs have been downloaded from the pirate networks—free of charge.

Music is at the center of the emotional lives of millions, the source of incalculable pleasure. Yet clearly many people have concluded that one needn't pay for it. If you've discussed the subject with anyone under 30 lately, this isn't surprising. The generation raised on the Internet doesn't think in terms of saving up for a CD, but grabbing what it wants when it wants it. As the Rhapsody example shows, if you make the cost close to nominal, and offer a high-quality experience, people will probably be happy to pay a small sum, like chipping a couple of coins in a toll booth to keep moving.

This isn't great news for the record labels, some of which are now grudgingly embracing plans like advertiser-supported all-you-can-get music streaming. Things will be miserable for them until they concoct new ways to sell tunes, and those won't be as lucrative as the old ways. That's why a number of artists are abandoning traditional labels to sign with companies that have other agendas than selling music. Paul McCartney now records for Starbucks. Madonna—nothing if not a barometer for where the business is going—has inked a 10-year recording contract with concert giant LiveNation. Not far down the road, enabled by advances in digital storage, is an even scarier prospect for those who want the monetary value of music maintained: "Sometime in the next decade, we'll see a $100 device that fits in your pocket and holds all the music ever recorded by humanity," writes Princeton professor Ed Felton on his blog. "Copyright owners would be hard-pressed to fight such a system." So in a sense, it's irrelevant to argue what music is worth. Technology wants to make it close to free.

Thursday, 25 October 2007

Best DJs in the world!


Do you want to know the best Djs of 2007?

As every year, DJ magazine (after people voted) tells us who the best djs are in 2007.

I only write the top 10 (they wrote the top 100):

1 Armin Van Buuren - (Netherlands) Finally. Five years after entering the Top 10 of our DJmag Top 100 DJs poll, Armin van Buuren has been crowned the World’s No.1 DJ.

2 Tiësto - (Netherlands) After winning three years in a row before losing his crown to Paul van Dyk last year, Tiësto once again came close to lifting the No.1 title.

3 John Digweed - (England) John Digweed is well accustomed to long journeys. That’s largely a function of his globetrotting lifestyle of course, something he’s more than happy to talk about when DJmag tracks him down at Dallas airport.

4 Paul Van Dyk - (Germany) From the intense production involved in ‘In Between’ — the artist album he’s been perfecting for the last three years — to the high-energy live sets at the world’s biggest dance festivals, it’s been an exceedingly busy year for Paul van Dyk.

5 Sasha - (Wales) It’s been a period of change for Sasha. One of the world’s most widely travelled DJs, he cut back on his club activities during the first half of the year to spend more time in his studio in New York.

6 Above & Beyond - (England)

7 Carl Cox - (England)

8 Ferry Corsten - (Netherlands)

9 Infected Mushroom - (Israel)

10 David Guetta - (France)

--
In top 10: 3 guys from Netherlands, 3 from England, 1 from Germany, Wales, Israel and France.
And the women?

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

Investing in new music


In this article of The Independent, they explain how you can invest and help new 
unsigned bands.

Sellaband was the first to set out its online stall last year. Its concept is that fans invest money in the bands showcased on the website; if the group becomes the next Coldplay, or even the next CSS, the fans stand to get a return.

Slicethepie recruits online "scouts", who are paid between 5p and 25p to listen to and review tracks, which can be uploaded by any band who wants their music to be heard. Bands who impress the scouts (who rate tracks on a scale from one to 10) can then go on to "float" on the market and fans can buy shares – from a minimum value of £10 upwards. In return, fans receive a copy of the album and a right to buy tradeable "bets" on how many albums the artist will sell over the next two years.

AmazingTunes is a site where unsigned bands can upload their mp3. 70% of revenue from all tunes sales – after bank charges and taxes – will go straight to the artist.

Wednesday, 10 October 2007

Rick Rubin and the music business

A few days ago i read an italian translation of a long interview with Rick Rubin.
Here you can find the original version in english:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/02/magazine/02rubin.t.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Rick Rubin is one of the most famous producers in USA, he worked with people like Beastie Boys, Slayer, Red Hot Chili Peppers and Johnny Cash.
In the article Rubin explains his idea of fighting file sharing: "You would subscribe to music, You'd pay, say, $19.95 a month, and the music will come anywhere you'd like. In this new world, there will be a virtual library that will be accessible from your car, from your cellphone, from your computer, from your television. Anywhere. The iPod will be obsolete, but there would be a Walkman-like device you could plug into speakers at home. You'll say, 'Today I want to listen to ... Simon and Garfunkel,' and there they are. The service can have demos, bootlegs, concerts, whatever context the artist wants to put out. And once that model is put into place, the industry will grow 10 times the size it is now."

Is this system going to work?
Would you pay 19,95$ a month for something you can get for free in emule??
I doubt it...
 
- -