Showing posts with label military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military. Show all posts

Friday, 1 February 2008

Miscommunication between US and Iran



The year 2008 started in a very nice way, with a naval dispute between US
and Iran.

If you click here, you can download a video realeased from Pentagon, it's a
28.6 MB wmv file and you can see a 4:20 minutes file of the american
version.

One crew member of the US warship says:
"This is coalition warship. I am engaged in transit passage in accordance
with international law."
he doesn't get an understable answer and he says again:
"This is coalition warship. I am engaged in transit passage in accordance
with international law. I maintain no harm. Over!"

The most interesting part is the last 36 seconds when you can hear (the
video is just a black screen) a weird voice (it's like a voice from an horror film)
saying: "I am coming to you" and after the US crew member says"You're
approaching a coalition warship operating in international waters, your
identity is not known, your intentionts are unclear [...]" the unidentified
voice says "You will explode after a few minutes."

If you click here, you can see a Pentagon page with 2 versions of the naval dispute, the short version (i already talked about it) and the long version (45 minutes! but there's not sign of any creepy voice)

If you click here, you can see a short video (in Reuters site) that shows the iranian version.

The video showed an Iranian naval officer in a small speedboat speaking via
radio to a ship which could not be clearly identified (we know that there's
high probability it was the american warship).

Iranian officer: "Coalition warship 73 this (is an) Iranian navy patrol
boat"

"This is coalition warship 73. I read you loud and clear," the person
replied with an American accent.

The Iranian officer then appeared to ask for the ships to identify
themselves, though his words at times were indistinguishable:

"Coalition warship 73 this (is) Iranian navy patrol boat, request side
number ... operating in the area (at) this time."

In this video, there's no trace of the creepy voice threating to explod the
americans. Who said that? The iranian say: the audio of the voice was fabricated. Was it? Who can tell?

There are rumours, the Guardian (but it's not the only one) wrote about it,
that the threatening voice heard on the US clip may, in fact, be that of a
prankster given the nickname "Filipino Monkey".
According to wikipedia, "Filipino Monkey" is just a pseudonym used by radio
pranksters in maritime radio transmissions since at least the 1980s,
especially in the Persian Gulf.

If a radio prankster might cause an american warship almost firing against an
iranian boat, i would say that the naval system of communication is not
working properly, is it?

Friday, 2 November 2007

Teaching literature in the army



An interesting article from Newsweek: a professor at West Point tells us about her job of teaching soldiers literature.

We Band of Brothers’
By Jennie Yabroff, Nov 1, 2007
Soldiers in training might not immediately appreciate the value of literature. But professor Elizabeth Samet has found that in time many come to realize the power of words.

When 1st Lt. Max Adams was deployed to Iraq in 2002, he took with him a 20-pound hardback edition of the complete works of William Shakespeare. Sometimes he would read from it to his soldiers—speeches from "Henry V" were always crowd-pleasers. "The one about 'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers,' they always liked that one," Adams says. The rest of the time the book rode around on the floor of his Humvee "as an additional plate" providing one more layer of protection from potential IEDs. Adams, who left the Army last year, still has the book, "beaten to hell, with bootprints all over it."

Writer Elizabeth Samet would be pleased to hear that Adams found both philosophical and practical use for the text, which she assigned him for a literature class at West Point. "Books are weapons," she writes in her new memoir, "Soldier's Heart," an account of her 10 years of teaching the sole required literature course, English 102, to first-year "plebes" at the military academy known as Sparta. West Point was founded on the model of the "citizen soldier," which Samet traces back to the Iliad's portrayal of Hector: "his martial ambitions always seem to me bound up with the survival of the city and the culture he defends," she writes. Integral to this notion is an understanding of the culture the soldier is defending. Although Samet contends the citizen-soldier model may be giving way to that of the "military professional," who sees service as a career, not a civic duty, she believes it's more important today than ever for soldiers to have a grounding in literature.

"When we talk about the values and principles we are defending, so many of them are literary or cultural products," she says. "Writers like Emerson and Thoreau give us our ideas of liberty, democracy and independence. So much of our national identity is part of our literary inheritance." (Samet, who still teaches at West Point, spoke to NEWSWEEK as a civilian, and her views do not represent those of the United States Military Academy, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense.)

When Samet joined the faculty of West Point, fresh from her Ph.D. in English literature at Yale, the country was at peace. Over the years, though, readings like Tim O'Brien's Vietnam story "They Things They Carried" or Randall Jarrell's World War II poem "Death of the Ball Turret Gunner" took on new meaning as students saw former classmates deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq. "At first I didn't know what to do after September 11," she says. "But I realized what we did in that classroom was just as valuable as before. My responsibility was to make sure we could still do it." She says that while she doesn't use the war as a "test case" for her teaching in the way her colleagues do, the war often comes up in class discussions, though she adds, "I can't let what might happen take over what's happening in the classroom."

The image of a soldier with the Army Officer's Guide under one arm and Milton under the other may seem incongruous, even for those within the military. Samet says she often encounters initial resistance among students to her curriculum. "What we do in the classroom may be frustrating to people who expect 'deliverables'—you hear that word a lot here," she says. "In the world of West Point, where facts and solutions are valued, it requires a lot more patience to figure out what one got out of a poem." But former students say the lessons they learned in her class prove invaluable beyond the classroom.

"Engineering, science, math and political science are extremely important," says Adams. "But it's been my experience that they are not nearly as important in a combat zone as a passage from a play." Another former student, Andy Scott, now a captain, says simply, "Literature is good for the soul when you're deployed." (Like Samet, his comments do not reflect the views of the Army.) Samet, who regularly gets e-mails and letters from former students in Iraq and often sends care packages of books (Hemingway's "A Farewell to Arms," J. M. Coetzee's "Waiting for the Barbarians") when they run out of reading material, says she thinks about "the ultimate fate" of her students every day. In their e-mails they tell her what they're reading, eager to continue the literary discussion. One former student writes that Virginia Woolf's "Orlando" should be required reading for all cadets.

For Samet, teaching her students to recite a particular passage of text is not as important as teaching them critical thinking skills so they can make sound ethical decisions in pressure situations. She writes that she is opposed to our ongoing presence in Iraq and deeply troubled by the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo. She hopes her curriculum, which changes from year to year but may include Plutarch, Horace, Shakespeare and Freud, will help prevent future atrocities.

"My students are not going to be policy makers, except when they are on the ground, where they inevitably end up making decisions," she says. "I think if they have sharpened their analytical skills, if they are 'grade one thinkers,' that is the best insurance against the horrible things that have happened happening again. That is where the most pragmatic connection is between literature and war."
-----
At the beginning the journalist wrote: "When 1st Lt. Max Adams was deployed to Iraq in 2002" uhmm, 2002? are you sure? i don't think there were many american soldiers (with uniform) in Iraq before the invasion (March 2003). A typo?
 
- -